It’s incredible how totally dumb some people can be … an unfitting tribute to the 4th.
Donald Trump’s quite popular, we see. This should worry sane, educated and intelligent people not only in the USA, but also in North America and the rest of the world. This guy just yesterday told one of his crowds that he felt “like punching (one of the protesters at the rally) in the face”. Enough said to the sane, educated and intelligent among us.
There is actually a chance that this brash … adjectives defy me at the moment, so let’s just refer to this jerk as Trump, he has a chance to become the US president next November. Horror of horrors.
In order to view this scenario in a less negative light, we have to go with what may be referred to as the “Marxist Dialectic Route” [MDR] which argues that history unfolds dialectically. What this implies that for every Thesis, there is an Antithesis (anti-thesis), which invariably leads to a antagonistic struggle between these two with result that a Synthesis takes place, combining the “best” elements of both the above-mentioned Thesis [T] and Antithesis [A]. This Synthesis [S] then becomes a spanking new Thesis which we can and will label as T1. Hence the process begins again so that T1 + A1 = S1 and so it goes.
Back to Trump in a moment.
First though, it must be noted that a conservative view of the Dialectic as Marx, Karl, described it, would lead to the end of history as we know it because eventually all antagonistic stuff would be eliminated. Mao Zedong took care of that which doesn’t mean necessarily that Mao was a “conservative”; he probably decided that Marx’s theory needed a supplement purely to make this ideology more palatable with conservative Communists and/or Progressives in the house.
What he argued was this. He stated that there were going to exist “Non-Antagonistic” Syntheses and Antithesis which would enter the picture once the ultimate stage according to Marx had been reached. Then the contradictions between T and A would never end as we seek purer and purer forms of life, friendship, generosity, etc., all good.
With the Trump phenomenon, we are very much viewing his progress towards the Presidency as some kind of Antithesis of something more positive with the ultimate result being a higher Synthesis with Trump no longer in the picture.
The two questions that then come to mind are: (a) For how long must we endure him?; and (b) How much damage can he do in the time he remains “in the picture”?
All this is in the context of the Dialectical interpretation of history. If that theory did not exist or if we don’t swallow it “in all its glory” then God help us. All.
The man’s definitely in trouble. Ben Carson’s virtual admission that he lied about receiving a full scholarship to West Point and this in the aftermath of other questions being posed regarding the veracity of some autobiographical details as these have been both written and discussed by Carson himself, well let’s just put it this way: is that the sound of a nail being hammered into Carson’s coffin, I hear?
In a recent comment on Facebook, I said something to the effect that the more I got to know about Carson, the less I liked him. To that statement I would add, after having given his record a quick perusal at www.bbc.com., that I have absolutely NO respect for Ben Carson in either domain: on the one hand his reactionary, Christ-oriented message is not what 21st century Americans need right now. They need (and so do we, Canadians) a progressive political leader who will approach the challenges of high office in a way which will lighten the economic and social burdens which are driving many of us to desperation. Say, yeah. Yeah.
**But instead, we get this: according to the above-mentioned website, Ben Carson has compared gun control, political correctness, life in the US under Obama and the progressive movement in general to life under Nazi bootstraps. (I think “rule” is the word used, not “bootstraps”.)
Carson has apparently said that the fact that prison sex occurs supports his view that homosexuality is a choice. Say what?!
He has also stated that Muslims should be ruled out as far as their eligibility to run for the office of President is concerned, believe it or not, and is a bible-thumper which is a shame because what follows is gonna make Dr. Carson look pretty bad.
Not only is the man living in the Dark Ages ideologically (see above), but he has also shown us that he’s a liar, a stunning demonstration that Carson is a dishonest hypocrite who should quit the race. Now. Today. Right now. Don’t mean tomorrow. He’s supposed to be a Christian, even has a painting hanging on a wall of his house showing Carson, seated, and Jesus standing to his left, with the latter’s arm around a beaming Ben. I saw it on the television. A little pretentious. Yeah? Yeah.
He says he doesn’t believe that any religion is superior to another, yet he has said, in virtually the same breath, – out of the other side of his hypocritical face – that there’s only one way to get to God, and that’s through a belief and faith in Jesus which pretty much leaves most of the world’s population, the non-Christians among us, out in the cold, does it not?
I was surprised to find that a good friend of mine, a person who says that she is a Christian, holds the same belief as Carson so I won’t slam this “one path to God” idea more than to say this: Religious ideology of this nature causes division between Christians and everyone else – Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, and Jews, for example. Religious challenges are birthed when one group believes that its way is the best or the only way. Say yeah. This is one reason why I, a non-observant Jew, personally refuse to characterize the Jews, or any other religious group for that matter as the “chosen people”.
Now, back to Carson – Smokey has these words of wisdom for Ben: “Only you can prevent the raging inferno which your Presidential campaign is about to turn into. Get away. Now. Before your campaign spontaneously combusts from all the crap it has spouted”.
**Before continuing, if you are interested in more meat, I got the above info directly from the bbc site. I know the BBC has had its detractors over the years (as has its younger sister Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the CBC) but it’s still widely respected as a news gathering and distribution maven. See www.bbc.com.
Now for the other side of Carson’s coin – the non-political side, the character issues recently raised about Carson’s recall of events from a past stretching back fifty years, during Carson’s adolescence, when he claims to have gone after one of his peers with a hammer and to have tried to stab another of his so-called friends.
When confronted by a CNN person about the fact that no one has so far been able to vet these stories, he argued that he had changed the names of the people involved. “Was there any sort of disclaimer to that effect in his recently-published memoir/autobiography,” asks the CNN person.
“No,” answers Carson. Huh?
Carson, himself, brought these stories up in this book, no one else except him has put these tales out there, foolishly, as it looks at the time of this writing.
Two days ago, the big one dropped when people associated with the Carson campaign publicly admitted that Carson’s story about his having received a full scholarship to West Point is false. The fact of the matter is that this simply never happened.
Pathological liar for President, anyone? Or perhaps you’d prefer the most politically and militarily powerful country in our world to have as it’s leader a reactionary nut job? 🇺🇸
Or both of the above all rolled into one package, and a fairly off-putting one at that.
We need peace.
We need truth.
Many of us are in desperate straights which is why contemporary western youth (and not only western, but the young in the so-called Third, Fourth and Fifth Worlds too) – why do you think that contemporary youth is proving itself to be a fertile ground from which ISIS and other terrorist organizations have been able to radicalize and recruit girls, boys, men and women and to get these kids to commit acts of terror in the name of the Islamic state?
Yes, it’s because a goodly number of youthful members of society have become desperate. They feel completely hopeless and pretty much alone. They are looking for an identity divorced from western cultural and social values such as those associated with getting a good education to start and then moving on in attempts to make it in the world, with family, friends, a car and a house.
We, Hippies that we were and some of us still are, reject these values as well but we do it in a reasonable and much more moderate way. I only gloat about my car and my bike to bug people; these things do not define me. I hope not anyway. Don’t get me wrong; I am not dissatisfied with the things I own. I do not need them however. I don’t have to drive a Cadillac or a Harley. I drive them because I enjoy nice things.
What we don’t need is Ben Carson or anyone else who even comes close to thinking like him. Our needs require direction from a totally different person who occupies a place on the political continuum as divorced as possible from Carson in particular, and from the Republicans, in general. I know that the American people are not yet desperate enough to throw their electoral support to Carson or someone like him, but that day may soon be upon us at which time I’d have purchased and learnt to use a weapon.
Starting off with the third Republican debate last last week: Carson and Trump, especially the latter, toned down which was surprising in Trump’s case considering the subject of the debate which was supposed to be finance and Trump’s career in business.
Marco Rubio got the better of Jeb Bush in an exchange begun when the former Florida Governor attempted to take Rubio to task – at least that was what it looked like he was trying to do anyway – based on Rubio’s spotty attendance record as a US Senator. Bush told Rubio that he should show up for work when it came to light that Rubio had missed over seventy Senate votes in the last year, which does seem like a high total if it’s true. (Note that Obama and John Kerry, Democrats both, had missed comparable time in their respective runs for President.)
That’s not the point though. Rubio confronted Bush with the following repost: “You’re only saying that because someone told you that attacking me was the right way to go,” or words to that effect at any rate. Well, no fucking kidding, Rubio. Talking about stating the obvious. And besides, isn’t everyone trying to do the same thing to everyone else in the first place?
The accolades garnered by Rubio were both heartening in the sense that it makes me happy when Jeb gets knocked but disheartening at the same time.
Disheartening in the way that the whole debate and the race in general, seems to be playing out. Chris Christie whom I actually can’t really stand, put it out there that the “American people” aren’t interested in personal attacks but would rather hear discussions dealing with issues like jobs, education and health care, although the latter dies in Republican-land – won’t glorify it by calling it a “nation” because that would imply some kind of principled approach to policy-making beyond the “I-Me-Mine” approach favoured by the more conservative segment of American society.
These men and one woman are not – to use a seasonal reference – the most brightly lit pumpkins in the window, you realize. According to Bloom’s taxonomy, there are eight different types of intelligence such as athletic, intellectual (intelligence), artistic musical and emotional as well as a few others. These guys may be inclined to be intelligent – but in many of these cases, this would not be intelligence in the sense of the word as it is generally understood and used.
Let’s deal with the obvious idiots: Michael “Mike” Huckabee is an opportunistic, bible-thumping, evangelistic moron. He’s the one who went down to Kentucky to defend the rights of he then incarcerated county clerk, Kim Davis, who had directly disobeyed state law by refusing to grant marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples. A candidate for chief executive spouting off about judicial tyranny is certainly not my cup of tea to put it mildly. The fact that Huckabee doesn’t see the obvious contradiction between occupying the Office of Chief Executive on the one hand, and supporting a blatant law-breaker on the other, speaks to how ridiculous this clown’s campaign for the Presidency is, unless of course this guy has decided to cater to the lowest common denominator within the American electorate, the so-called reactionary Tea Party and voters of their ilk. If this is in fact true, it may make Huckabee a bit more politically astute than I have given him credit for but he’s still an idiot.
Donald Trump, yes, The Donald, Donald Duck. Certainly not an idiot in the usual sense but one nonetheless. A blusterer who could be dangerous if he wasn’t so dumb, again not in the conventional sense of dumb but dumb in the sense that he actually believes that transferring his personal lifestyle and ways of making his financial, business and various decisions to running a country, much less to his dealings with other world leaders would be the successful way to go. “We’ll build a wall … and get Mexico to pay for it.” Maybe this is intelligent to the extent that it is manipulative but this kind of thing will not stand the test of time. Not at all, Mr. Trump.
What about his proposal to get rid of some twelve million immigrants? Can a mind that small even begin to conceive of the logistical difficulties alone involved in the execution of so enormous a task? Think of the bureaucracy which would be required – mind-blowing.
Not to mention the social and psychological costs of so vast a deportation – there’s no room in Trump’s brain for considerations of a moral or ethical nature.
You would think that he would be better in measuring the economic impact of so huge a displacement of people. It would be difficult to actually realistically calculate the impact on the American GDP (Gross Domestic Product) if twelve million people were unceremoniously dumped out of the country; regardless of that fact, there will be an impact and I would guess that overall, in the medium term, the impact would be negative. Mr. Trump. Businessman. Beeg businessman. Beeg, huge businessman. Hey Joe. What do y’all really know?
Regardless of all of his wealth and business success, he does not have the intellectual energy to lead what still is the most powerful nation in the history of the world. Like it or not, we live next to the Leviathan and having Trump in charge – which will never happen – would put the entire world in danger. That’s all for Trump. A true idiot with business acumen and loads of bread.
Jeb Bush. Ah Jeb. Jeb the jerk. I was mildly concerned to see this guy announce his candidacy. However, he just hasn’t caught on, continuing to trail badly in the polls, reminding voters of his brother and father, Presidents both. His brother, George W., although meeting with some success in his obvious effort to rehabilitate his image, was intensely disliked. This was an important reason for Obama’s successful bid for the Presidency in 2008.
Jeb’s campaign is dying at the moment, with his financial backers which include his Super Pac (Presidential Action Committee), the latter having raised over $100 million, calling for more bang for their buck. Apparently Bush!s failure to turn things around during the third debate, was too much for some of the wealthy ones who have, with their donations to his campaign, made Jeb’s run possible. Rumour has it that some of these contributors may be looking for another horse on which to place their bets.
Lindsey Graham, Senator from South Carolina, who, on March 7, 2015, at a “Politics and Pies” forum, … advocated the reversal of defense spending cuts and quipped: “If I were President of the United States, I wouldn’t let Congress leave town until we fix this. I would literally use the military to keep them in if I had to.” Great idea from a not the most reactionary person in the group but an idiot nonetheless.
Ted Cruz: a real greaser who has obviously been told to stop using shit on his hair which was a good move but still doesn’t cover up the type of person that Cruz has been proven to be.
He has an informal alliance with Donald Trump, a self-serving move which Teddy-boy hopes will garner him a significant slice of the Donald’s support if and when Trump is forced out of the race as a result of a slide in the polls which has already begun.
Cruz is extremely conservative and proud of it.
Note: In Canada, calling someone a “socialist” is tantamount to labelling your political opponent a “liberal” in the Excited States, which somewhat and somehow the explains the pride (and total lack of reticence) which many Americans take in unabashedly calling themselves and the people they support “conservatives”. By the way, the term “reactionary” is an antonym for the term “progressive” and means “conservative in the extreme”.
A reactionary wants to re-enact the past. That would mean returning to the past including outlawing abortion, getting rid of Obamacare (Medicare), and in Canada, returning to the days of capital punishment.
These certainly are not the only idiots in the group, but it’s a good start.